busit na kongreso yan, nang-gugulo na naman. bakit kc kelangan pang-i-brought up ulet ung charter change na yan. bwisit tlaga.
imo, there shouldn't be any charter change ever again, not until they have proven that they can implement ALL existing Laws and IF ALL politicians are clean, patriotic and true to their responsibilities, cannot be bought by money or any riches in this world.
Ni hindi man nga nila mapatupad ng maayos ang mga batas na nagawa na, tapos ngayn babaguhin pa nila ung constitution. sasabihin nila para sa kabutihan ng bansa, BS!!!!
kung ung mga batas na nakakabuti sa bansa di nila mapatupad, eh ung gagalawin pa nila ang constitution, mapagkakatiwalaan ba ung mga taong ganyan. eh parang ung pagbabagong gagawin nila eh hindi naman para sa pilipinas o sa pilipino kundi sa mga dayuhang nagbayad sa kanila.
sana maging trilyonaryo ako, para ako na lang ang magbabayad sa kanila para gawin kung anong mabuti para sa bansa. alam naman natin na ang pulitika hindi malinis, kahit saang bansa. kaya kung ganun ang sistema, at ang ibang pulitiko eh nag-iisip ng sa bulsa lang nila, un n lng ang gagawin ko, bayaran sila ng maraming milyong piso, para gawin ang pinag-sumpaan nilang responsibilidad nung maupo sila sa gobyerno.
sasabihin nila na nahuhuli ang pilipinas sa ibang bansa dahil luma ang constitution lolz. dahil hindi tayo nagbebenta ng lupa sa mga dayuhan lolz. eh anong gusto nilang mangyari, maging squatter sa sariling bansa ang halos ng mga pilipino. sino lang ba ang mga may lupa dito, ang mga ayala, yuchengco, tan, mga pulitiko, mga artista, etc. pano ung mga middle class na pilipino, ma-uungusan na ng mga dayuhan at pagdating ng panahon, wala ng pag-aari dito.
bakit di nila ayusin ang mga red tape sa pagtatag ng business, at turuan ang bawat OFW kung pano magtayo ng sariling negosyo, at ng magkaroon ng businesses at trabaho ang mga pilipino. neways, mas alam "cguro" nila kung anong dapat sa bansa, kaso pano mo naman mapagkakatiwalaan ang mga pulitikong silaw lang ng pera ang tinitingnan at hindi ang consequence ng actions nila. future generations ng pilipino ang maapektuhan dito eh.
dapat NEVER ng palitan ang constitution!! kung gusto man nilang palitan, dapat LAHAT ng nsa pulitika eh mga taong mapagkakatiwalaan, makabayan at hindi ganid sa pera ang gagawa.... eh mangyayari ba un, di naman fairy tale 'tong buhay natin.
parang ang dating ng nangyayari eh masyadong konti lang ata ang laman ng utak ng mga taong nagsusulong ng charter change. sa mga nakikita nilang "problema", eh ang solusyon lang nila eh "charter change". wla na silang ibang maisip? o baka naman di talaga sila nag-iisip dahil kelangan lng naman iabot ang pera sa kanila, at para silang robot na gagalaw kung anong sinabi nung nag-abot.
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
rh bill teledrama
one of the things i find amusing in politics is how some people can sell themselves for money.
maybe it's just me and maybe because of watching so much political series and movies that when i see something fishy, i recognize it in an instant.
what's happening now with the rh bill debate and the characters surrounding it, i find them all so amusing. i see them as puppets on strings. what the puppet master tells them, they do. so, with this drama, they can show that they are debating, they can show that they are on different sides but at the end of the day most of them have already been paid millions of dollars to just do what that puppet master tells them to do. selling their souls, their country, their children's future for money. they think that because they are rich, their children or family will live a better lives, lolz, maybe they haven't yet realize that if the puppetmaster(s) can move today to take advantage of a country, they can just easily destroy one family. they won't be safe just because they are rich. i don't know how they could sell themselves for money, i mean, i thought there are still some intelligent people in politics, maybe 1 or 2 huh... but those shown on tv news certainly don't resemble any intelligence.
they could do anything they want with the power they have and make laws that will affect filipinos for centuries to come, but i hope someday they'll realize that those money they receive will mean nothing because they will also be slaves.
tv news showed yesterday that there are pro and anti rh bill. i just laughed when i saw that segment of them arguing, coz for me it's so obvious. they are arguing and leading the conversation out of the main issue. maybe it's just me being disappointed at how inarticulate and how inefficient those anti-rh bill congresspeople are that i see them as people who have been paid off to just say what they were told to say and not really fight for the rights of the people.
why are they not arguing about the necessity of this bill?
is it really needed when there is already a department of health, with provisions to provide people (in every place here in philippines) with information about health, family planning, contraceptives, etc.
edcel lagman said that the bill will give "access" to those that won't have it. does that mean that this bill is just a bill so they can get more money for department of health to provide freebies for people, so that means that sexual promiscuity is more important than food or livelihood? for him, that's how he cares for the people of this country.
and then they have pacquiao as their face or representative for anti-rh bill group? i don't even think he understood the bill. lolz. i also saw some congressmen who talked about religion. it is good that they took into consideration some religious belief, but i think they twisted it and made it a laughingstock, w/c maybe what the person who paid them, wanted them to do.
so for me, this rh bill, is like a teleserye where there is only one writer and the characters just follow what they're told.
neways, out of the more than 2,000 pending bills in senate and congress, why are we concentrating on only one? if we are already worried about the contents of ONE controversial bill, what more can we say about those thousands of pending bills. if we can't trust the government officials to do their decision-making based on the good of the people and this country and not on money, what would this country's future be?
well, maybe the future is not that dire, since laws in this country are treated like they're just suggestions.
maybe it's just me and maybe because of watching so much political series and movies that when i see something fishy, i recognize it in an instant.
what's happening now with the rh bill debate and the characters surrounding it, i find them all so amusing. i see them as puppets on strings. what the puppet master tells them, they do. so, with this drama, they can show that they are debating, they can show that they are on different sides but at the end of the day most of them have already been paid millions of dollars to just do what that puppet master tells them to do. selling their souls, their country, their children's future for money. they think that because they are rich, their children or family will live a better lives, lolz, maybe they haven't yet realize that if the puppetmaster(s) can move today to take advantage of a country, they can just easily destroy one family. they won't be safe just because they are rich. i don't know how they could sell themselves for money, i mean, i thought there are still some intelligent people in politics, maybe 1 or 2 huh... but those shown on tv news certainly don't resemble any intelligence.
they could do anything they want with the power they have and make laws that will affect filipinos for centuries to come, but i hope someday they'll realize that those money they receive will mean nothing because they will also be slaves.
tv news showed yesterday that there are pro and anti rh bill. i just laughed when i saw that segment of them arguing, coz for me it's so obvious. they are arguing and leading the conversation out of the main issue. maybe it's just me being disappointed at how inarticulate and how inefficient those anti-rh bill congresspeople are that i see them as people who have been paid off to just say what they were told to say and not really fight for the rights of the people.
why are they not arguing about the necessity of this bill?
is it really needed when there is already a department of health, with provisions to provide people (in every place here in philippines) with information about health, family planning, contraceptives, etc.
edcel lagman said that the bill will give "access" to those that won't have it. does that mean that this bill is just a bill so they can get more money for department of health to provide freebies for people, so that means that sexual promiscuity is more important than food or livelihood? for him, that's how he cares for the people of this country.
and then they have pacquiao as their face or representative for anti-rh bill group? i don't even think he understood the bill. lolz. i also saw some congressmen who talked about religion. it is good that they took into consideration some religious belief, but i think they twisted it and made it a laughingstock, w/c maybe what the person who paid them, wanted them to do.
so for me, this rh bill, is like a teleserye where there is only one writer and the characters just follow what they're told.
neways, out of the more than 2,000 pending bills in senate and congress, why are we concentrating on only one? if we are already worried about the contents of ONE controversial bill, what more can we say about those thousands of pending bills. if we can't trust the government officials to do their decision-making based on the good of the people and this country and not on money, what would this country's future be?
well, maybe the future is not that dire, since laws in this country are treated like they're just suggestions.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
angelo reyes
sad to hear about the death of a former major general in afp. imo, he was helpless, from watching the news earlier and the reporter's investigative shows from the 3 channels, i came to that conclusion. he was betrayed by his kumpare, and he was left all alone by the person he thought would help him.
it's really difficult to play in the world of politics, in the end, it's all about your own survival. arroyo, already has lots of problems from her zte scandal, and then one of her probably cronie killing 50 plus people and now garcia and the afp. what i find funny in this whole garcia-afp case is that the group of people who are "investigating" this case are they themselves not so-called "clean". i see it as: ung mga malalaki at matatabang buwaya sa senate and congress eh sila ang nag-iimbestiga sa mga maliliit na buwaya ng afp. they're talking abt 10million funds given to generals who retired, but what about the hundred millions in some big projects of the government. so, sa palagay ko kung mag-iimbestiga sila, ilagay nila ang taong di naman gumawa kahit kelan nung krimeng pinapataw nila dun sa akusado. may makikita ka bang ganun sa mga senador or congressman/woman.
and to think sa afp p lng un, isang institution lng yan, do you think ung pnp, wlang ganun or any branch of government don't have those kinds of thing happening. they can call it pabaon or whatever, but it's the same, corruption. and it's really really really funny that estrada is one of the two people who started this. hindi ba merong mga assets ang pamilya nila na di rin ma-explain kung san nanggaling ang pera. preho lng sila ng mga arroyo. i dont believe anyone in politics is clean. if you're in politics, you are automatically in a big institution where the system is already corrupt. and probably it's easier to get things done that way. so if you have the power and the money and other resources, you can get whatever you want done. so, i just look at the people inside that political arena, who are actually patriotic and doing things for their country while playing the game of politics.
there are people who are new and would like to make changes in politics, but their means are like trying to use a plastic knife to cut a big sturdy tree. it's utterly, useless. their intention is good, but looking at the big picture, the consequences of those actions, and the end result when the dust settles. i don't think their actions of bringing down garcia would result in anything at all. this case would be forgotten and people would move on. why do you think garcia hasn't killed himself yet, maybe it's because he has some high cards in his hands. there are big people who's going to support him because they don't want their corruption to be known as well. reyes, most probably, don't have those cards.
---------------------
i think, this will go on for a few months, and then it will be forgotten when another big issue surfaces. i just hope when they start something, they would think of the consequences and make sure they win and have made even a little change to the system. it's my opinion, that some politicians of course, don't want to have any organization other than themselves to investigate corruption, because then it will all be over and they can't make their government position a cash cow anymore. actually, if they would just allow to have every person in public office have transparent way of taking and spending money then there wouldn't be any problem. i mean, anong mahirap dun, kung i-d-declare ng pangulo, o eto ung natanggap ng congressman chuchu, tapos ung congressman sasabihin, d2 napunta ang bawat sentimo nung budget na binagay sa akin, pagkatapos merong mag-d-double check nung in-audit, eh di wlang problema, pero sa palagay mo naman, sino sa lahat ng mga nasa public office ang papayag sa ganun?
it's really difficult to play in the world of politics, in the end, it's all about your own survival. arroyo, already has lots of problems from her zte scandal, and then one of her probably cronie killing 50 plus people and now garcia and the afp. what i find funny in this whole garcia-afp case is that the group of people who are "investigating" this case are they themselves not so-called "clean". i see it as: ung mga malalaki at matatabang buwaya sa senate and congress eh sila ang nag-iimbestiga sa mga maliliit na buwaya ng afp. they're talking abt 10million funds given to generals who retired, but what about the hundred millions in some big projects of the government. so, sa palagay ko kung mag-iimbestiga sila, ilagay nila ang taong di naman gumawa kahit kelan nung krimeng pinapataw nila dun sa akusado. may makikita ka bang ganun sa mga senador or congressman/woman.
and to think sa afp p lng un, isang institution lng yan, do you think ung pnp, wlang ganun or any branch of government don't have those kinds of thing happening. they can call it pabaon or whatever, but it's the same, corruption. and it's really really really funny that estrada is one of the two people who started this. hindi ba merong mga assets ang pamilya nila na di rin ma-explain kung san nanggaling ang pera. preho lng sila ng mga arroyo. i dont believe anyone in politics is clean. if you're in politics, you are automatically in a big institution where the system is already corrupt. and probably it's easier to get things done that way. so if you have the power and the money and other resources, you can get whatever you want done. so, i just look at the people inside that political arena, who are actually patriotic and doing things for their country while playing the game of politics.
there are people who are new and would like to make changes in politics, but their means are like trying to use a plastic knife to cut a big sturdy tree. it's utterly, useless. their intention is good, but looking at the big picture, the consequences of those actions, and the end result when the dust settles. i don't think their actions of bringing down garcia would result in anything at all. this case would be forgotten and people would move on. why do you think garcia hasn't killed himself yet, maybe it's because he has some high cards in his hands. there are big people who's going to support him because they don't want their corruption to be known as well. reyes, most probably, don't have those cards.
---------------------
i think, this will go on for a few months, and then it will be forgotten when another big issue surfaces. i just hope when they start something, they would think of the consequences and make sure they win and have made even a little change to the system. it's my opinion, that some politicians of course, don't want to have any organization other than themselves to investigate corruption, because then it will all be over and they can't make their government position a cash cow anymore. actually, if they would just allow to have every person in public office have transparent way of taking and spending money then there wouldn't be any problem. i mean, anong mahirap dun, kung i-d-declare ng pangulo, o eto ung natanggap ng congressman chuchu, tapos ung congressman sasabihin, d2 napunta ang bawat sentimo nung budget na binagay sa akin, pagkatapos merong mag-d-double check nung in-audit, eh di wlang problema, pero sa palagay mo naman, sino sa lahat ng mga nasa public office ang papayag sa ganun?
Thursday, January 27, 2011
rh bill
my last post was almost two years ago... neways, i just have to comment on this and get this anger out of my system.... i am angry at those people who seem to think that this bill is good for women or for any citizen of the philippines... are they thinking straight? have they even read the bill? most importantly, have they UNDERSTOOD what the bill is saying and the consequences if ever it was implemented? i doubt they did.
i read an article on gmanews.tv about rh bill
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/211540/group-asks-church-think-of-women39s-health-support-rh-bill
i found this quotation funny:
"We strongly believe that couples, especially women, would be given the freedom to choose the path they will take in raising their family and have the social responsibility to act in accordance with their conscience and the means within their disposal."
i was thinking, don't we, as citizens of this country, Philippines, already have the freedom that they're asking for? why do we need that bill to become law?
currently, we already have the freedom to choose what to use when having sex... why do we need a law to tell us what we can and cannot use during sex? isn't that dictatorship?
they said it was for women's health... so that means if it's for health, the lawmakers can dictate what the citizens of this country can and cannot use? so at this time, they are only targeting those things used for sex or family planning.... what's next? since it's for health, they can most probably also tell (dictate) us what we can and cannot use when we are exercising... it's for health, right? what else, food, since they are very much concerned about our health, they can also dictate what we can and cannot eat.... wow, applause for the lawmakers. ano 'to, martial law?
the bill also mentioned about abortion (w/c i think some media news programs fail to mention).... there are already women having it, although illegally... so is that the purpose of this bill? to make abortion legal? i dont know...
neways, those arguing over the bill seem to not see those points i have mentioned
we already have the freedom to choose, what is the bill for? really, seriously
if they can dictate what's good for women's health, is that still called freedom?
i read an article on gmanews.tv about rh bill
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/211540/group-asks-church-think-of-women39s-health-support-rh-bill
i found this quotation funny:
"We strongly believe that couples, especially women, would be given the freedom to choose the path they will take in raising their family and have the social responsibility to act in accordance with their conscience and the means within their disposal."
i was thinking, don't we, as citizens of this country, Philippines, already have the freedom that they're asking for? why do we need that bill to become law?
currently, we already have the freedom to choose what to use when having sex... why do we need a law to tell us what we can and cannot use during sex? isn't that dictatorship?
they said it was for women's health... so that means if it's for health, the lawmakers can dictate what the citizens of this country can and cannot use? so at this time, they are only targeting those things used for sex or family planning.... what's next? since it's for health, they can most probably also tell (dictate) us what we can and cannot use when we are exercising... it's for health, right? what else, food, since they are very much concerned about our health, they can also dictate what we can and cannot eat.... wow, applause for the lawmakers. ano 'to, martial law?
the bill also mentioned about abortion (w/c i think some media news programs fail to mention).... there are already women having it, although illegally... so is that the purpose of this bill? to make abortion legal? i dont know...
neways, those arguing over the bill seem to not see those points i have mentioned
we already have the freedom to choose, what is the bill for? really, seriously
if they can dictate what's good for women's health, is that still called freedom?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
